Draft.dev

Balancing Open Source and Product Advocacy: Expert Guide

Draft.dev Team
5 min read
developer-marketing
TL;DR: Open source and product advocacy should complement rather than compete with each other. Success depends on transparency, maintaining engagement in both communities, involving engineers (not just marketing) in open source efforts, and understanding that product marketing drives short-term goals while open source builds long-term credibility. Key principles for balancing open source and product advocacy:
  • Maintain transparency: Never neglect your open source project as enterprise business grows
  • Evolve both offerings: Develop open source and enterprise products in parallel but different directions
  • Engineer-led engagement: Engineers, not just marketing, should interact with open source communities
  • Track meaningful metrics: Focus on engagement, contributions, and MAU/MAD rather than vanity metrics
  • Think long-term: Enterprise customers often start as open source users who mature into paying accounts

In this Draft.dev webinar, we explored the delicate balance between open source advocacy and product marketing with two industry veterans: Matt McClintock, Head of Content at Revelo, and Dewan Ishtiaque Ahmed, Principal Developer Advocate at Harness.

You can watch the entire webinar here:

Open-Source Advocacy Vs. Product Advocacy

When discussing open-source advocacy versus product advocacy, our experts emphasized that these approaches should complement each other rather than compete.

“The key difference here is the ownership. In open-source projects, everyone is the owner; we all have stakes in this. With product advocacy, it’s you versus me. You trying to sell me something, which is not bad, it’s just the fact.” – Dewan Ishtiaque Ahmed [04:09]

Maintaining Authenticity and Credibility

Transparency emerged as the cornerstone of successful advocacy strategies across both domains. Matt emphasized the importance of not neglecting your open-source product as your enterprise business grows:

“You shouldn’t just say, ‘Okay, we have millions of downloads on our open source project. Now we’re just gonna leave GitHub and solely focus on building out the enterprise business.’ Developers will very much not respond well to that.” – Matt McClintock [14:50]

A common pitfall that both experts warned against is removing features from the open-source version to drive enterprise adoption. Instead, they recommended evolving both offerings in parallel but in different directions.

Dewan reinforced this perspective by highlighting the importance of maintaining multiple feedback channels:

“Your mechanism of getting feedback and tracking could be different, but you don’t shut down the open source path and just focus on enterprise because they’re paying customers. Your open source community might be your customers – not yet, they might be customers later.” – Dewan Ishtiaque Ahmed [15:43]

Measuring Success and Community Health

When it comes to measuring the effectiveness of open source initiatives, our experts identified several key metrics:

  • Engagement and contributions: Are community members actively participating?
  • Downloads and adoption: How many people are using your open source project?
  • Monthly active users/developers (MAU/MAD): The “North Star” metrics for tracking community health
  • Quality feedback: Valuable input that can inform both open source and enterprise roadmaps

Matt cautioned against relying solely on vanity metrics like GitHub stars, emphasizing instead the importance of genuine engagement. He also shared a crucial insight about who should be interacting with your open source community:

“That is a common mistake or missed opportunity… Sometimes it’s marketing that’s sort of engaging with the open-source community, and it really should be your engineers.” – Matt McClintock [19:11]

Setting Realistic Expectations

While product advocacy efforts might yield immediate, trackable results, open source community building requires a longer-term perspective.

Matt recommended regularly sharing success stories with leadership about enterprise customers who started as open source users:

“A lot of our longer-term customers started off with our open-source offering… built a bunch of processes that they run their organization off of, and then got to a point where, ‘All right, we’re using this product so much, it’s so critical to our business that it would probably be a good idea to get the Enterprise version.'” – Matt McClintock [24:33]

Practical First Steps for Organizations

For companies just beginning to balance open source and product advocacy, our experts offered these practical recommendations:

  1. Understand your audience: Start by analyzing why your open source community grew in the first place
  2. Recognize developers as kingmakers: Remember that individual engineers often influence tool adoption across organizations
  3. Create gathering opportunities: Consider user conferences (even virtual ones) to learn from and engage with your community
  4. Leverage existing events: You don’t need to create your own events – participate in established meetups and conferences where your audience already gathers

“You can even engage with existing events or meetups because you all share the same audience… You can sponsor one of the DevOps days. You can have a booth. You can just have your engineers attend those events.” – Dewan Ishtiaque Ahmed [30:39]

How to turn readers into customers.

Conclusion

The relationship between open-source advocacy and product marketing continues to evolve, but the fundamental principles remain consistent: transparency, community engagement, and authentic communication. By understanding your audience, empowering your power users, and maintaining a long-term perspective, organizations can successfully navigate this balancing act.

Draft.dev’s webinars are a great way to learn more about similar DevRel and technical marketing topics.

Draft.dev Fireside webinars:

Draft.dev Educational webinars:

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between open source advocacy and product advocacy?

The key difference is ownership. In open source projects, everyone is an owner with shared stakes in the project's success. Product advocacy is inherently transactional with a vendor-customer relationship. Open source advocacy focuses on community building and collective improvement, while product advocacy aims to drive specific business outcomes and conversions.

How do you maintain authenticity when balancing open source and product marketing?

Maintain authenticity through transparency and continued engagement with open source communities even as enterprise business grows. Never abandon your open source project after achieving commercial success. Evolve both open source and enterprise offerings in parallel but in different directions rather than removing features from open source to force enterprise upgrades. Keep multiple feedback channels active for both communities.

What metrics should you track for open source community health?

Focus on engagement and contributions from community members, downloads and adoption rates, monthly active users or developers (MAU/MAD) as North Star metrics, and quality feedback that informs product roadmaps. Avoid relying solely on vanity metrics like GitHub stars. Track genuine engagement indicators that demonstrate active community participation and value creation.

Should marketing or engineers engage with open source communities?

Engineers should lead engagement with open source communities, not just marketing teams. This is a common missed opportunity where companies assign community interaction to marketing when engineers should be the primary participants. Engineers bring technical credibility, can provide deeper technical support, and build more authentic relationships with developer communities.

Should you remove features from open source to drive enterprise adoption?

No, removing features from open source versions to force enterprise upgrades damages community trust and authenticity. Instead, evolve both offerings in parallel but in different directions. Add enterprise-specific features that serve larger organizations without degrading the open source experience. Developers will not respond well to feature removal tactics.

About the Author

Draft.dev Team

Draft.dev is a content-powered Growth Marketing for developer tools and platforms. We build technical content engines that compound and resonate with developers, search engines, and LLMs.

Share this article:TwitterLinkedIn

Continue Reading

Explore our complete library of technical content marketing resources and developer relations insights.

View all posts

Want to learn more about how we work?